business
Hosted by Bristows LLP · business · EN-GB
Bristows' patent litigation experts unpack key UPC decisions, explore their implications, and share practical strategies to help your business navigate the UPC with confidence. Note: All information was correct at the time of recording.
Required Pod Score for this podcast. PitchCentric checks your profile against host openness, topical fit, and audience signals before you generate a pitch.
Contact path
Verified email
Booking probability
35%
Guest openness
Selective
Sign up to generate a grounded pitch for You, me & the UPC.
Signup to Generate a PitchBristows' patent litigation experts unpack key UPC decisions, explore their implications, and share practical strategies to help your business navigate the UPC with confidence. Note: All information was correct at the time of recording.
You, me & the UPC is hosted by Bristows LLP. The show has published 110 episodes to date.
Recent episodes include "Case by Case | Court of Appeal provides guidance on electronic signatures and language of proceedings in Esko dispute" (30 October 2026, 4 minutes), "Case by Case | Paris Local Division finds Align’s clear-aligner patent valid and infringed" (30 October 2026, 3 minutes), and "Case by Case | Düsseldorf LD clarifies limits of r.171(2) RoP." (23 October 2026, 2 minutes).
You, me & the UPC publishes roughly weekly, with episodes averaging 4 minutes across 110 episodes.
Booking probability for You, me & the UPC is 35%, and the host is rated Selective on guests. You, me & the UPC requires a Pod Score of 80 or higher. You, me & the UPC's contact route on record: verified email.
The strongest fits for You, me & the UPC are Law & Legal Services. You, me & the UPC has a business audience.
Bristows LLP hosts You, me & the UPC, a business podcast with 110 episodes published.
Our AI reads these to draft pitches. Use them as grounding for a pitch that cites a real guest and a specific topic.
Episode #100
The Court of Appeal (CoA) has confirmed the limited circumstances in which it will interfere with First Instance determinations concerning language and has also provided clarity on formalities relating to electronic...
Episode #101
Melissa Dix talks you through a Paris LD decision from 16 October 2026. The Paris LD held that Align’s patent relating to orthodontic clear aligners was valid and infringed by Angelalign. The Court granted an injunction...
Episode #99
Milly Wickson discussed the Inficon v Elitech decision from the Düsseldorf LD today. On 6 October 2026, the Düsseldorf LD clarified the limits of r.171(2) RoP when assessing technical evidence of infringement in Inficon...
Episode #98
Sam Harvey unpacks a Court of Appeal (CoA) decision today. BF exaCQ AG and ParTec AG, the claimants in these proceedings, had brought patent infringement proceedings against the defendant, NVIDIA in front of the Munich...
Episode #97
The Brussels LD has refused the defendants’ requests for disclosure in 2seventy bio v Johnson & Johnson and in doing so, provided important guidance on entitlement challenges and the procedural status of patent...
Episode #93
On 15 September 2026, the Munich LD upheld DivX's unitary patent relating to progressive media streaming and found that Netflix indirectly infringed through the supply of its streaming software. Netflix had sought...
Episode #94
Today, Olivia Henry unpacks both the first instance and appeal decisions in the Sidel v Omnia case. If you have any feedback, questions, or comments, please email us at upcpodcast@bristows.com . Find all the episodes as...
Episode #92
Melissa Dix discusses a Milan Local Division (LD) decision from 7 September today. The LD granted Abbott a UPC-wide PI against the Chinese company SiSensing and four of its subsidiaries. Abbott is the main supplier of...
Episode #91
Ewan MacAulay walks you through the Munich Central Division (CD) which was handed down in the free-standing revocation action brought by Wittenstein SE (Wittenstein) against Vestas Wind Systems (Vestas) in relation to a...
Episode #89
Cassie Blackburn discusses a Court of Appeal (CoA) decision from 3 September in this episode. The CoA issued its decision in WEPA Nederland B.V. v Essity Hygiene concerning an application for evidence preservation and...
Episode #90
Listen to Cassie Blackburn's analysis of the Düsseldorf Local Division (LD) decision in fiskaly GmbH v SwissBit AG and Swissbit Germany AG , also concerning an application for evidence preservation and inspection...
Episode #88
Rachael Cartwright explores a decision that will be of particular interest to medical device manufacturers and their regulatory representatives. The Düsseldorf Local Chamber (LC) considered the scope of liability of an...
Episode #86
Patrick Newlands talks about a Hamburg Local Decision (LD) today from 24 August 2026. The LD issued a significant FRAND decision in Fraunhofer v HMD , rejecting HMD’s FRAND defence while providing guidance on when an...
Episode #87
Florence Plisner unpacks a Court of Appeal (CoA) decision. The CoA dismissed Sibio’s appeal against the Paris Central Division’s decision upholding Abbott’s patent relating to continuous glucose monitoring devices, in a...
Episode #85
Eden Winlow speaks on a Court of Appeal (CoA) decision today. The CoA set aside penalty orders requiring Kodak to pay €1.72 million for alleged non-compliance with an earlier infringement judgment in favour of Fujifilm...
Episode #84
On 30 July 2026 the Paris Local Division (LD) refused to stay the infringement action initiated by several companies in the Merz group (Merz) despite parallel revocation proceedings before the Paris National Court...
Episode #82
Ewan MacAulay discusses a Court of Appeal (CoA) (Panel 3, Judge Ulrike Voß presiding) handed down on 8 July 2026. It concerned AngelAlign’s appeal against the 12 February 2026 order of the Düsseldorf Local Division (LD)...
Episode #83
On 15 July 2026, the CoA issued an order in proceedings between Qualcomm and Network System Technologies , clarifying aspects of the how UPC Court fees should be calculated when filing appeal proceedings. The dispute...
Episode #80
In today's episode, Rebekka Thomas discusses the Court of Appeal decision in Fujifilm v Kodak concerning EP 3 476 616, relating to lithographic printing plate precursors, manufacturing methods and printing methods. The...
Episode #81
Luke Norton explores the Düsseldorf Local Division decision in InterDigital v The Walt Disney from 23 July 2026, finding that Disney had infringed InterDigital’s patent EP 2 449 782, which relates to the signalling of...
Recent guests on You, me & the UPC. Study who booked and why before you pitch.
paediatric cardiologist, International Airport Equipment Manufacturers' Association
executive for a defense manufacturing company, writer, management and communications consultant, defense manufacturing company
Community and Economic Development program lead at UNH Cooperative Extension, Etcho
PitchCentric classifies You, me & the UPC under these industries. Guests from them are the closest fit, and each links to the best podcasts in that industry.
Shows with the most semantically similar episode content. Pitch one, pitch all; producers cluster.
Is this podcast yours and you'd like to remove or correct details? Request removal or email privacy@pitchcentric.com.
Questions about the free trial? See the pricing FAQ
