Hosted by The Life of the Law · 🇺🇸 US · EN-US · 181 episodes
Established thought leaders with verified media credentials.
Supreme Court oral argument audio recordings paired with show notes that include helpful information and links to additional resources on the Supreme Court's website. Independent feed. NOT affiliated with the Supreme Court of the United States or any other entity. Audio credit to the Supreme Court of the United States. Image credit to Ian Hutchinson, https://unsplash.com/photos/U8WfiRpsQ7Y.
The Life of the Law hosts SCOTUS Oral Arguments, a government show with 181 episodes published.
Hikma Pharmaceuticals USA Inc. v. Amarin Pharma, Inc., No. 24-889 Argued on Apr 29 2026. For petitioners: Charles B. Klein, Washington, D. C.; and Malcolm L. Stewart, Deputy Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Wash
Mullin, Sec. of Homeland Security v. Doe, No. 25-1083 Argued on Apr 29 2026. For petitioners: D. John Sauer, Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C. For respondents in 25-1083: Ahilan T. Arulanantham,
Cisco Systems v. Doe I, No. 24-856 Argued on Apr 28 2026. For petitioners: Kannon K. Shanmugam, Washington, D. C.; and Curtis E. Gannon, Deputy Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C. (for United Stat
Monsanto Co. v. Durnell, No. 24-1068 Argued on Apr 27 2026. For petitioner: Paul D. Clement, Alexandria, Va.; and Sarah M. Harris, Principal Deputy Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C. (for United
Chatrie v. United States, No. 25-112 Argued on Apr 27 2026. For petitioner: Adam G. Unikowsky, Washington, D. C. For respondent: Eric J. Feigin, Deputy Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C. Question
Blanche, Acting Atty Gen. v. Lau, No. 25-429 Argued on Apr 22 2026. For petitioner: Sopan Joshi, Assistant to the Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C. For respondent: Shay Dvoretzky, Washington, D.
FCC v. AT&T, No. 25-406 Argued on Apr 21 2026. For AT&T, Inc. and Verizon Communications Inc.: Jeffrey B. Wall, Washington, D. C. For FCC, et al.: Vivek Suri, Assistant to the Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Wa
T. M. v. Univ. of MD Medical Sys. Corp., No. 25-197 Argued on Apr 20 2026. For petitioner: Elizabeth B. Prelogar, Washington, D. C. For respondents: Lisa S. Blatt, Washington, D. C. Question Presented: Whether the Rooker
Sripetch v. SEC, No. 25-466 Argued on Apr 20 2026. For petitioner: Daniel L. Geyser, Dallas, Tex. For respondent: Malcolm L. Stewart, Deputy Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C. Question Presented:
Trump, President of U.S. v. Barbara, No. 25-365 Argued on Apr 01 2026. For petitioners: D. John Sauer, Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C. For respondents: Cecillia D. Wang, San Francisco, Cal. Qu
Pitchford v. Cain, No. 24-7351 Argued on Mar 31 2026. For petitioner: Joseph J. Perkovich, New York, N. Y. (Appointed by this Court.) For respondents: Scott G. Stewart, Solicitor General, Jackson, Miss.; and Emily M. Fer
Abouammo v. United States, No. 25-5146 Argued on Mar 30 2026. For petitioner: Tobias S. Loss-Eaton, Washington, D. C. For respondent: Anthony A. Yang, Assistant to the Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington
Jules v. Andre Balazs Properties, No. 25-83 Argued on Mar 30 2026. For petitioner: Adam G. Unikowsky, Washington, D. C. For respondents: Daniel L. Geyser, Dallas, Tex. Question Presented: Under Sections 9 and 10 of the F
Flowers Foods, Inc. v. Brock, No. 24-935 Argued on Mar 25 2026. For petitioners: Traci L. Lovitt, New York, N. Y. For respondent: Jennifer D. Bennett, San Francisco, Cal. Question Presented: Are workers who deliver local
Noem, Sec. of Homeland v. Al Otro Lado, No. 25-5 Argued on Mar 24 2026. For petitioners: Vivek Suri, Assistant to the Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C. For respondents: Kelsi B. Corkran, Washing
Keathley v. Buddy Ayers Construction, Inc., No. 25-6 Argued on Mar 24 2026. For petitioner: Gregory G. Garre, Washington, D. C.; and Frederick Liu, Assistant to the Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D
Watson v. RNC, No. 24-1260 Argued on Mar 23 2026. For petitioner: Scott G. Stewart, Solicitor General, Jackson, Miss. For respondents: Paul D. Clement, Alexandria, Va.; and D. John Sauer, Solicitor General, Department of
Montgomery v. Caribe Transport II, LLC, No. 24-1238 Argued on Mar 04 2026. For petitioner: Paul D. Clement, Alexandria, Va. For respondents: Theodore J. Boutrous, Jr., Los Angeles, Cal.; and Sopan Joshi, Assistant to the
Hunter v. United States, No. 24-1063 Argued on Mar 03 2026. For petitioner: Lisa S. Blatt, Washington, D. C. For respondent: Zoe A. Jacoby, Assistant to the Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C. Que
United States v. Hemani, No. 24-1234 Argued on Mar 02 2026. For petitioner: Sarah M. Harris, Principal Deputy Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C. For respondent: Erin E. Murphy, Alexandria, Va. Qu
Sponsor detection runs nightly. Check back soon.
No public pitch examples yet for this show.
Generate your own personalised pitchBased on semantic analysis of episode topics and host coverage, this show is a strong guest fit for executives in:
Industry fit is computed by PitchCentric using vector embeddings of the show's episode catalog.
Shows with the most semantically similar episode content. Pitch one, pitch all; producers cluster.
SCOTUS Oral Arguments has a verified contact on file. Create a free PitchCentric account to access it and generate a personalised pitch in seconds. Research at least 3 recent episodes first and lead with a specific angle that serves their government audience.
SCOTUS Oral Arguments is hosted by The Life of the Law. The show is categorised under government (news) and has published 181 episodes.
SCOTUS Oral Arguments has published 181 episodes.
SCOTUS Oral Arguments regularly covers government, news, politics. It sits in the government category, with a news focus.
SCOTUS Oral Arguments is accessible for guests with genuine government expertise. A personalised, episode-aware pitch will still outperform a generic one every time.
SCOTUS Oral Arguments hasn't explicitly signalled guest openness in recent episodes. That doesn't rule out pitching. your hook just needs to be especially compelling and relevant to their recent content.
Episodes of SCOTUS Oral Arguments average 91 minutes, giving guests a long-form format with plenty of time to expand on their expertise.
Our data rates SCOTUS Oral Arguments's guest bar at 80/100 (Premium tier). Established thought leaders with verified media credentials. Sign in to PitchCentric to see how your own Pod Score compares against this show.
Methodology. Booking Probability™ blends Listen Score, 30-day Virality, open-to-guests detection, and Apple ratings. Data refreshed every 60 minutes. Listen Score and Booking Probability are calculated by PitchCentric. Last enriched yesterday.
