![[25-1083] Mullin v. Doe episode artwork](https://scotusstats.com/podcast/podcast.jpg)
[25-1083] Mullin v. Doe
Mullin v. Doe Justia · Docket · oyez.org Argued on Apr 29, 2026. Petitioner: Markwayne Mullin, Secretary, Department of Homeland Security. Respondent: Dahlia Doe. Advocates: D. John Sauer (for the Petitioners) Ahilan T.

Loading…

Hosted by scotusstats.com · 🇺🇸 US · EN-US · 489 episodes
Established thought leaders with verified media credentials.
A podcast feed of the audio recordings of the oral arguments at the U.S. Supreme Court. * Podcast adds new arguments automatically and immediately after they become available on supremecourt.gov * Detailed episode descriptions with facts about the case from oyez.org and links to docket and other information. * Convenient chapters to skip to any exchange between a justice and an advocate (available as soon as oyez.org publishes the transcript). Also available in video form at https://www.youtube.com/@SCOTUSOralArgument
scotusstats.com hosts Supreme Court Oral Arguments, a government show with 489 episodes published.
![[25-1083] Mullin v. Doe episode artwork](https://scotusstats.com/podcast/podcast.jpg)
Mullin v. Doe Justia · Docket · oyez.org Argued on Apr 29, 2026. Petitioner: Markwayne Mullin, Secretary, Department of Homeland Security. Respondent: Dahlia Doe. Advocates: D. John Sauer (for the Petitioners) Ahilan T.
![[24-889] Hikma Pharmaceuticals USA Inc. v. Amarin Pharma, Inc. episode artwork](https://scotusstats.com/podcast/podcast.jpg)
Hikma Pharmaceuticals USA Inc. v. Amarin Pharma, Inc. Justia · Docket · oyez.org Argued on Apr 29, 2026. Petitioner: Hikma Pharmaceuticals USA Inc. Respondent: Amarin Pharma, Inc. Advocates: Charles B. Klein (for the Pet
![[24-856] Cisco Systems, Inc. v. Doe I episode artwork](https://scotusstats.com/podcast/podcast.jpg)
Cisco Systems, Inc. v. Doe I Justia · Docket · oyez.org Argued on Apr 28, 2026. Petitioner: Cisco Systems, Inc. Respondent: Doe I. Advocates: Kannon K. Shanmugam (for the Petitioners) Curtis E. Gannon (for the United Sta
![[25-112] Chatrie v. United States episode artwork](https://scotusstats.com/podcast/podcast.jpg)
Chatrie v. United States Justia · Docket · oyez.org Argued on Apr 27, 2026. Petitioner: Okello T. Chatrie. Respondent: United States of America. Advocates: Adam G. Unikowsky (for the Petitioner) Eric J. Feigin (for the R
![[24-1068] Monsanto Company v. Durnell episode artwork](https://scotusstats.com/podcast/podcast.jpg)
Monsanto Company v. Durnell Justia · Docket · oyez.org Argued on Apr 27, 2026. Petitioner: Monsanto Company. Respondent: John L. Durnell. Advocates: Paul D. Clement (for the Petitioner) Sarah M. Harris (for the United St
![[25-429] Blanche v. Lau episode artwork](https://scotusstats.com/podcast/podcast.jpg)
Blanche v. Lau Justia · Docket · oyez.org Argued on Apr 22, 2026. Petitioner: Todd Blanche, Acting Attorney General. Respondent: Muk Choi Lau. Advocates: Sopan Joshi (for the Petitioner) Shay Dvoretzky (for the Responden
![[25-406] Federal Communications Commission v. AT&T, Inc. episode artwork](https://scotusstats.com/podcast/podcast.jpg)
Federal Communications Commission v. AT&T, Inc. Justia · Docket · oyez.org Argued on Apr 21, 2026. Petitioner: Federal Communications Commission, et al. Respondent: AT&T, Inc. . Advocates: Jeffrey B. Wall (for AT&T, Inc.
![[25-466] Sripetch v. SEC episode artwork](https://scotusstats.com/podcast/podcast.jpg)
Sripetch v. SEC Justia · Docket · oyez.org Argued on Apr 20, 2026. Petitioner: Ongkaruck Sripetch. Respondent: Securities and Exchange Commission. Advocates: Daniel L. Geyser (for the Petitioner) Malcolm L. Stewart (for
![[25-197] T. M. v. University of Maryland Medical System Corporation episode artwork](https://scotusstats.com/podcast/podcast.jpg)
T. M. v. University of Maryland Medical System Corporation Justia · Docket · oyez.org Argued on Apr 20, 2026. Petitioner: T. M. Respondent: University of Maryland Medical System Corporation. Advocates: Elizabeth B. Prelo
![[25-365] Trump v. Barbara episode artwork](https://scotusstats.com/podcast/podcast.jpg)
Trump v. Barbara Justia · Docket · oyez.org Argued on Apr 1, 2026. Petitioner: Donald J. Trump, President of the United States. Respondent: Barbara. Advocates: D. John Sauer (for the Petitioners) Cecillia D. Wang (for th
![[24-7351] Pitchford v. Cain episode artwork](https://scotusstats.com/podcast/podcast.jpg)
Pitchford v. Cain Justia · Docket · oyez.org Argued on Mar 31, 2026. Petitioner: Terry Pitchford. Respondent: Burl Cain, Commissioner, Mississippi Department of Corrections. Advocates: Joseph J. Perkovich (for the Petiti
![[25-5146] Abouammo v. United States episode artwork](https://scotusstats.com/podcast/podcast.jpg)
Abouammo v. United States Justia · Docket · oyez.org Argued on Mar 30, 2026. Petitioner: Ahmad Abouammo. Respondent: United States of America. Advocates: Tobias S. Loss-Eaton (for the Petitioner) Anthony A. Yang (for the
![[25-83] Jules v. Andre Balazs Properties episode artwork](https://scotusstats.com/podcast/podcast.jpg)
Jules v. Andre Balazs Properties Justia · Docket · oyez.org Argued on Mar 30, 2026. Petitioner: Adrian Jules. Respondent: Andre Balazs Properties. Advocates: Adam G. Unikowsky (for the Petitioner) Daniel L. Geyser (for t
![[24-935] Flower Foods, Inc. v. Brock episode artwork](https://scotusstats.com/podcast/podcast.jpg)
Flower Foods, Inc. v. Brock Justia · Docket · oyez.org Argued on Mar 25, 2026. Petitioner: Flower Foods, Inc., et al. Respondent: Angelo Brock. Advocates: Traci L. Lovitt (for the Petitioners) Jennifer D. Bennett (for th
![[25-5] Noem v. Al Otro Lado episode artwork](https://scotusstats.com/podcast/podcast.jpg)
Noem v. Al Otro Lado Justia · Docket · oyez.org Argued on Mar 24, 2026. Petitioner: Kristi Noem, Secretary of Homeland Security. Respondent: Al Otro Lado, a California Corporation. Advocates: Vivek Suri (for the Petition
![[25-6] Keathley v. Buddy Ayers Construction, Incorporated episode artwork](https://scotusstats.com/podcast/podcast.jpg)
Keathley v. Buddy Ayers Construction, Incorporated Justia · Docket · oyez.org Argued on Mar 24, 2026. Petitioner: Thomas Keathley. Respondent: Buddy Ayers Construction, Incorporated. Advocates: Gregory G. Garre (for the
![[24-1260] Watson v. Republican National Committee episode artwork](https://scotusstats.com/podcast/podcast.jpg)
Watson v. Republican National Committee Justia · Docket · oyez.org Argued on Mar 23, 2026. Petitioner: Michael Watson, Mississippi Secretary of State. Respondent: Republican National Committee, et al. Advocates: Scott G.
![[24-1238] Montgomery v. Caribe Transport II, LLC episode artwork](https://scotusstats.com/podcast/podcast.jpg)
Montgomery v. Caribe Transport II, LLC Justia · Docket · oyez.org Argued on Mar 4, 2026. Petitioner: Shawn Montgomery. Respondent: Caribe Transport II, LLC. Advocates: Paul D. Clement (for the Petitioner) Theodore J. Bou
![[24-1063] Hunter v. United States episode artwork](https://scotusstats.com/podcast/podcast.jpg)
Hunter v. United States Justia · Docket · oyez.org Argued on Mar 3, 2026. Petitioner: Munson P. Hunter. Respondent: United States of America. Advocates: Lisa S. Blatt (for the Petitioner) Zoe A. Jacoby (for the Responden
![[24-1234] United States v. Hemani episode artwork](https://scotusstats.com/podcast/podcast.jpg)
United States v. Hemani Justia · Docket · oyez.org Argued on Mar 2, 2026. Petitioner: United States of America. Respondent: Ali Danial Hemani. Advocates: Sarah M. Harris (for the Petitioner) Erin E. Murphy (for the Respo
Sponsor detection runs nightly. Check back soon.
No public pitch examples yet for this show.
Generate your own personalised pitchBased on semantic analysis of episode topics and host coverage, this show is a strong guest fit for executives in:
Industry fit is computed by PitchCentric using vector embeddings of the show's episode catalog.
Shows with the most semantically similar episode content. Pitch one, pitch all; producers cluster.








Supreme Court Oral Arguments has a verified contact on file. Create a free PitchCentric account to access it and generate a personalised pitch in seconds. Research at least 3 recent episodes first and lead with a specific angle that serves their government audience.
Supreme Court Oral Arguments is hosted by scotusstats.com. The show is categorised under government (news) and has published 489 episodes.
Supreme Court Oral Arguments has published 489 episodes.
Supreme Court Oral Arguments regularly covers government, news, politics. It sits in the government category, with a news focus.
Supreme Court Oral Arguments is accessible for guests with genuine government expertise. A personalised, episode-aware pitch will still outperform a generic one every time.
Supreme Court Oral Arguments hasn't explicitly signalled guest openness in recent episodes. That doesn't rule out pitching. your hook just needs to be especially compelling and relevant to their recent content.
Episodes of Supreme Court Oral Arguments average 91 minutes, giving guests a long-form format with plenty of time to expand on their expertise.
Our data rates Supreme Court Oral Arguments's guest bar at 80/100 (Premium tier). Established thought leaders with verified media credentials. Sign in to PitchCentric to see how your own Pod Score compares against this show.
Methodology. Booking Probability™ blends Listen Score, 30-day Virality, open-to-guests detection, and Apple ratings. Data refreshed every 60 minutes. Listen Score and Booking Probability are calculated by PitchCentric. Last enriched yesterday.