An unscheduled, unpredictable Supreme Court podcast. Hosted by Will Baude and Dan Epps. In partnership with SCOTUSblog.
Required Pod Score for this podcast. PitchCentric checks your profile against host openness, topical fit, and audience signals before you generate a pitch.
Contact path
Verified email
Booking probability
35%
Guest openness
Selective
Sign up to generate a grounded pitch for Divided Argument.
Signup to Generate a PitchRecent episodes include "You Should See the Other Guy" (28 October 2026, 70 minutes), "A Thriving Atrocities Practice" (19 August 2026, 75 minutes), and "Very Civilized Orangutans" (12 August 2026, 69 minutes).
Divided Argument publishes roughly weekly, with episodes averaging 67 minutes.
Booking probability for Divided Argument is 35%, and the host is rated Selective on guests. Divided Argument requires a Pod Score of 80 or higher. Divided Argument's contact route on record: verified email.
The strongest fits for Divided Argument are Courts, Police & Public Safety. Divided Argument has a news audience.
Divided Argument is a news podcast.
Our AI reads these to draft pitches. Use them as grounding for a pitch that cites a real guest and a specific topic.
Episode #1
Divided Argument — S7E1: Summary & Highlights One-line summary (Beamly) Season 7 opens with a Court busy not deciding: an Alito recusal, a quorum lost to four book deals, and a stern Purcell per curiam for Missouri...
Episode #29
After following up on Justice Alito's summer interview, the new birthright-citizenship executive orders, and the Court's record-low approval numbers, we devote the episode to Cisco Systems v. Doe , the Falun Gong...
Episode #28
We squeeze in one more episode before Will's vacation, tying the single-season record in the process. The mailbag then demands a reckoning on whether Magneto's powers are really limited to ferrous metals, along with the...
Episode #27
We're back — maybe getting a little too scheduled — with one opinion on the docket: West Virginia v. B.P.J. and Little v. Hecox , where the Court held that states may limit girls' and women's sports teams to biological...
Episode #25
We picked two immigration decisions from the same day over the transgender-sports case because — Dan’s protests notwithstanding — that’s where the interesting law is. In Mullin v. Doe the Court lets the administration...
Episode #24
After a quick check on the Nina Totenberg embargo kerfuffle and one more revelation from Justice Thomas's memoir, we devote the episode to Chatrie v. United States , the Court's first major Fourth Amendment decision in...
Episode #23
It's the last opinion day of the term, and the big one landed: Trump v. Barbara , the birthright-citizenship case. We read the majority as the rare easy case and spend most of the episode on why the four dissents each...
Episode #22
The big opinions are coming fast and furious as the Term ends. This episode, we take on two related cases from the penultimate opinion drop day: Trump v. Slaughter , which overrules Humphrey's Executor and clears away...
Episode #21
We're in triage mode as the Court clears its end-of-term backlog. We run through the week's opinion dump before focusing on two cases that look unrelated but turn on the same question: when may a state rewrite...
Episode #20
The big opinions are starting to drop, and we're doing our best to keep pace. We first discuss Landor v. Louisiana Department of Corrections , which concerns religious liberty, the scope of Congress's power to create...
Episode #17
The Court has been busy, and we somehow manage to cover a number of developments with unpredictable efficiency. We talk about the Court's latest summary reversal on the "party presentation principle"; Justice...
Episode #16
We are joined by guest co-host Professor Pam Karlan at the American Law Institute Annual Meeting for the last live show of season 6. We work through a busy stretch of the interim docket: the Alabama GVR in Allen v...
Episode #15
The Court’s latest Voting Rights Act decision, Louisiana v. Callais , narrows Section 2 in a way that could reshape redistricting, weaken majority-minority districts, and intensify the fight over how race and...
Episode #14
A deep dive into the latest Supreme Court news, a couple of unusual shadow docket rulings, and a cross-ideological merits decision that raises classic questions about federal power, preemption, and how much weight lower...
Episode #13
We recap and reflect on the oral arguments in Trump v. Barbara (the birthright citizenship case) and then analyze the Court's recent decision in Chiles v. Salazar , about the First Amendment limits on Colorado's...
Episode #12
We're live at WashU Law's Admitted Students Day! After catching up on some shadow docket activity, we dig into Olivier v. City of Brandon , the Court's unanimous March 2026 decision by Justice Kagan. A Mississippi...
Episode #11
We announce an exciting new partnership with SCOTUSblog and introduce the show to new listeners. We then return to the mysterious origins of the Chief Justice's "no, no, a thousand times no," debate the Court's new...
Episode #10
It's our live show at the University of Chicago! Hosted by the University of Chicago Federalist Society, we discuss this week's big shadow-docket rulings about gender transitions in California Schools ( Mirabelli v...
Episode #9
With unpredictable timeliness, we have a quasi-emergency episode on the 170-page tariffs decision, Learning Resources, Inc. v. Trump . Come for the in-the-weeds legal analysis, stay for the deep dive into the origins of...
Episode #8
We're back for another live show at the Northwestern Pritzker School of Law, hosted by the Northwestern Federalist Society! We discuss the term's two Second Amendment arguments -- first recapping the oral argument in...
Recent guests on Divided Argument. Study who booked and why before you pitch.
Theodore J. St. Antoine Collegiate Professor of Law, University of Michigan Law School
ABC News legal analyst, co-host of Advisory Opinions podcast, editor of SCOTUSblog, author of The Last Branch Standing, Advisory Opinions
Antonin Scalia Professor of Law, Duke University School of Law
Charles Seligson Professor of Law and Faculty Director of the Zimroth Center on the Administration of Criminal Law at New York University School of Law, New York University School of Law
PitchCentric classifies Divided Argument under these industries. Guests from them are the closest fit, and each links to the best podcasts in that industry.
Shows with the most semantically similar episode content. Pitch one, pitch all; producers cluster.
Supreme Court Opinions
PBS News Hour - Supreme Court
SCOTUS Oral Arguments
Supreme Court Oral Arguments
Oral Arguments - The Supreme Court of the United States
Cases and Controversies
Is this podcast yours and you'd like to remove or correct details? Request removal or email privacy@pitchcentric.com.
Questions about the free trial? See the pricing FAQ