🔎 Daily True Crime Stories | Unsolved Mysteries | Criminal Investigations | Cold Cases True Crime Today is your go-to daily true crime podcast , bringing you the latest murder cases, ongoing trials, criminal psychology insights, and shocking unsolved mysteries . Whether it’s breaking crime news, high-profile trials, serial killers, missing persons, or cold cases , we cover it all with expert analysis, investigative storytelling, and real-time updates . 🎙️ Hosted by leading crime analysts , we uncover the psychology of killers, forensic breakthroughs, police investigations, and courtroom drama —giving you the full story behind the headlines . From notorious cases to little-known crimes that deserve attention , we break down what really happened and why . If you're obsessed with true crime podcasts , criminal psychology, and investigative reporting, subscribe to True Crime Today on Apple Podcasts now! 🎧 New episodes daily.
Pitch Analysis
Required Pod Score for this show. PitchCentric checks your profile against host openness, topical fit, and audience signals before you generate a pitch.
Contact path
Verified email
Booking probability
38%
Guest openness
Selective
Verified email on file
80/100
Required Score
Sign up to generate a grounded pitch for True Crime Today | Daily True Crime News & Interviews.
What is True Crime Today | Daily True Crime News & Interviews?
True Crime Today | Daily True Crime News & Interviews is a commentary podcast hosted by Unknown Host, with 500 episodes on record and a Required Pod Score of 80. PitchCentric scores this show on Booking Probability, Listen Score, and live audience signals refreshed every 24 hours.
About the host
Unknown Host hosts True Crime Today | Daily True Crime News & Interviews, a commentary show with 500 episodes published.
JP Miller Was in Mica's Life Since She Was WHAT Age?!
Sep 14, 202614 min
JP Miller timeline — Mica Miller met the man who would become her husband when she was a teenager at his youth ministry in Myrtle Beach. Netflix's Death of the Pastor's Wife exposed the timeline. JP led youth worship at Solid Rock Church. Mica was among his congregants. He was fifteen years her senior. When she married her first husband, Jeremy, JP officiated. After that marriage ended, Mica worked for JP. In 2015, when she was twenty and JP was thirty-five, he confessed from his pulpit to "a moral failing." Both marriages ended. JP set the terms. They married in November 2017. Mica died at Lumber River State Park on April 27, 2024, at thirty. JP faces federal trial in October 2026 on cyberstalking and false statements charges. Former FBI Special Agent Jennifer Coffindaffer breaks down the methodology. Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292 Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1 Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Check out Robin Dreeke’s Master Class http://masterclass.com/robindreeke This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice. #JPMiller #MicaMiller #DeathOfThePastorsWife #Netflix #CoerciveControl #SolidRockChurch #Pastor #RedFlags #MyrtleBeach #TrueCrime
Lindsay Clancy’s 11-1 Split Got WHAT Response From Tim Cruz?!
Sep 13, 202633 min
A mistrial usually resets a case. Lindsay Clancy’s left prosecutors with a reported 11-1 split and a public statement from DA Tim Cruz defending the theory jurors could not unanimously accept. Cruz described the deaths as the “cruel and calculated killing of three innocents” and said the evidence suggested to his office that Clancy was in control. Judge William Sullivan declared the mistrial September 4 after jurors deliberated for more than 38 hours across seven days. Kevin Reddington says eleven jurors favored acquittal. That figure comes from the defense, and no verdict was returned. The underlying legal divide remains the same: the defense attributed Clancy’s actions to postpartum psychosis and lack of criminal responsibility, while the prosecution argued she understood the wrongfulness of her conduct and could choose differently. Eric Faddis joins Tony Brueski with experience on both sides of a criminal courtroom. He examines how prosecutors evaluate a failed first trial, what juror feedback can reveal, when expert testimony needs rebuilding, and how a district attorney weighs retrial against a plea or another resolution. Cruz has authority to try the case again. The first jury still gave his office a result it has to evaluate before choosing that path. Psychotherapist Shavaun Scott examines the social fallout that followed the same trial. She focuses on the fear underneath the public argument over postpartum psychosis and why people reach for labels that create distance from severe mental illness. Scott also considers what the public spectacle may communicate to mothers who are afraid to disclose disturbing symptoms. Patrick Clancy’s attorney has said another trial would be extraordinarily painful for him and his family. Cruz has not announced his decision. Both sides are scheduled to return to court September 29, where the legal consequences of the mistrial begin taking shape. Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292 Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1 Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice. #LindsayClancy #TimCruz #TrueCrimeToday #EricFaddis #ShavaunScott #PostpartumPsychosis #Mistrial #Retrial #PatrickClancy #TrueCrimeNews
Lindsay Clancy’s Lone Holdout Was Accused of Ignoring WHAT?!
Sep 13, 202642 min
The Lindsay Clancy holdout controversy centers on what the jury foreperson allegedly reported to the court, not simply on a juror voting differently. Kevin Reddington said the foreperson identified one juror who acknowledged doubt but would not apply Judge William Sullivan’s instruction on reasonable doubt. That distinction mattered because jurors are allowed to disagree, including as a minority of one. Sullivan questioned jurors about their ability to follow the law and repeated the legal standard, but he declined Reddington’s request to remove the holdout. Seven days and more than 38 hours of deliberations ended with a September 4 mistrial. The legal fallout did not stay inside Plymouth Superior Court. On September 8, Howard Cooper, attorney for Patrick Clancy, said online creators had spread false claims accusing Patrick of involvement in the deaths of his children. Cooper warned that appropriate legal measures would be pursued and said law enforcement had been notified. Robin Dreeke, former FBI counterintelligence behavioral expert, joins Tony Brueski to separate the observable group dynamics from speculation about what a single juror believed. Eric Faddis, defense attorney and former felony prosecutor, explains why judges protect the secrecy and independence of deliberations even when other jurors report a problem. Faddis then turns to the accusations involving Patrick and the legal exposure that can arise when commentary makes provably false factual claims about an identifiable person. The combined discussion follows two lines courts guard carefully: the independence of a juror and the boundary between protected speech and actionable defamation. Lindsay Clancy’s next scheduled court date is September 29 while prosecutors consider whether to retry the case. Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292 Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1 Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice. #LindsayClancy #PatrickClancy #TrueCrimeToday #JuryDeadlock #ReasonableDoubt #RobinDreeke #EricFaddis #DefamationCase #CourtroomCoverage #TrueCrimePodcast
Donna & Wendi Adelson: Donna's Alleged Jail Script Said WHAT?!
Sep 13, 202646 min
The Dan Markel murder-for-hire case turned a jailhouse notebook into evidence against Donna Adelson. Drina Bernhardt testified that Donna wrote a question-and-answer script meant to feed Bernhardt false testimony about Katherine Magbanua, and a state handwriting analyst testified that the writing belonged to Donna. Donna had been arrested one week after Charlie's 2023 conviction as she and Harvey prepared to travel to Vietnam on one-way tickets. Bernhardt said Donna promised $10,000 and a grand piano if she helped. Donna's attorneys challenged the witness and argued Bernhardt pushed Donna to write the material so Bernhardt could help herself. A second jailhouse witness also testified that Donna confessed and discussed false testimony, while the defense highlighted inconsistencies in that account. At sentencing, Donna maintained her innocence and told Judge Stephen Everett she had never received a parking ticket. Prosecutors paired the jailhouse evidence with 44 checks Donna signed to Magbanua after the murder. They argued the payments connected Donna to the conspiracy. The defense said Donna was following Charlie's instructions because he claimed Magbanua and others were extorting him. The jury convicted Donna after roughly three hours of deliberation. Wendi Adelson remains uncharged, and Jeffrey Lacasse's testimony creates a separate factual conflict. Lacasse said Wendi told him five days before Markel was shot that Charlie had considered "all options" for the "Danny Markel problem," including hiring a hitman for about $15,000. Wendi denied making that statement. Lacasse also testified that Wendi questioned him about his Friday route in the days before the killing and later asked him not to contact her for a week. Wendi testified that the television being repaired at her home on the morning of the murder was not code. She also acknowledged seeing police tape near Markel's home without calling Markel or the children's daycare. Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292 Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1 Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice. #DanMarkel #DonnaAdelson #TrueCrimeToday #WendiAdelson #JeffreyLacasse #AdelsonFamily #MurderForHire #TrialEvidence #Florida #TrueCrime
Nick Reiner & Lindsay Clancy: What Separates These Cases?!
Sep 13, 202646 min
Nick Reiner and Lindsay Clancy are now sharing space in the same public argument: when does mental illness explain conduct, and when does the evidence still point toward criminal responsibility? Their cases reach that question through very different records. Reiner faces two murder charges for the deaths of his parents, Rob and Michele Reiner, and has pleaded not guilty. Prosecutors also allege special circumstances for multiple murders and lying in wait. Reiner had spoken publicly for years about addiction and recovery, describing repeated treatment, homelessness, relapses, and destructive behavior during drug use. Those statements provide history, but they do not establish his state of mind at the time of the charged killings. Clancy's state of mind was the central issue at her Massachusetts trial. Her lawyers argued postpartum psychosis made her not criminally responsible for the deaths of her three children. The prosecution presented experts who disputed that conclusion and argued she could understand that her actions were wrong. The jury deadlocked, producing a September 4 mistrial. Jurors later described an 11-1 split in favor of an insanity verdict. The public response has moved beyond legal standards. A TikTok creator claimed he called off a $200,000 wedding after his fiancee disagreed with him about Clancy and called her a monster. The dispute turned a murder trial into a test of whether compassion for a defendant reveals something unacceptable about the person expressing it. Psychotherapist Shavaun Scott, author of Nightbird, joins Tony Brueski to examine that leap. They compare what addiction can do to judgment with what psychosis can do to a person's perception of reality, while keeping the legal allegations separate. They also examine why audiences reach for simple labels when the actual question is whether a specific defendant had the capacity required for criminal responsibility at a specific moment. Reiner is scheduled to return to court September 15. Clancy still faces charges after the mistrial. Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292 Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1 Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice. #NickReiner #LindsayClancy #TrueCrimeToday #ShavaunScott #RobReiner #MicheleReiner #MentalHealthDefense #PostpartumPsychosis #TrueCrime #CriminalResponsibility
Every question we get asked before someone starts their trial.
If you have a concern about deliverability, AI quality, data privacy, or whether this will actually work for your specific situation, it's probably answered below.
What is the difference between Founder Solo and Founder Pro?
Founder Solo gives you 50 AI pitches per month using the credit model (Standard pitches cost 1 credit, Enriched pitches cost 2). Founder Pro raises that to 200 credits per month and adds full Booking Probability access, unlimited Magic Match, Apollo enrichment credits, and data export capabilities. Both plans use the same credit system, so you can stretch your monthly budget further by using Standard-mode drafting.
How do agency tiers work?
Agency tiers have no base fee. You pay per managed client and per talent profile. Agency Standard is $199 per client per month; Agency Pro is $399 per client per month. Both add $39 per talent profile per month. Your own team's user seats are always free.
What is a talent profile?
A talent profile represents one person (founder, executive, or spokesperson) you are booking onto podcasts. It includes their bio, topics, headshots, and outreach history. Team plans include 5 profiles; agency plans are pay-as-you-go.
Can I switch plans later?
Yes, at any time. Upgrades take effect immediately; downgrades apply at the end of the current billing period. Contact support if you need help migrating between plan families.
Do you offer a free trial?
Every paid plan includes a 15-day free trial. Your card is saved at signup but you will not be charged until day 16. Cancel any time from your dashboard.
What happens if I cancel?
You keep access until the end of your current billing period. No charges after that. Your data is retained for 30 days in case you reactivate.
Is the 20% annual discount automatic?
Yes. Select Annual on the pricing toggle and the discounted price is applied automatically at checkout. The annual price shown is the full year cost.
What if I have more than 50 profiles or 20 clients?
That is our Enterprise tier. Contact our sales team and we will build a custom plan with volume pricing, a dedicated account manager, and SLA guarantees.
