The Patentlytics Podcast

Welcome to Patentlytics Podcast where patents meet strategy, data, and real-world impact. We break down IP trends, cases, and decisions that actually matter, giving attorneys, in-house counsel, and innovators clear, practical insights. No fluff, just sharp thinking on how patents are used, challenged, and leveraged today. If you want to stay ahead in IP, this is your edge.

The Patentlytics Podcast is a general podcast hosted by Unknown Host, with 0 episodes on record and a Required Pod Score of 80. PitchCentric scores this show on Booking Probability, Listen Score, and live audience signals refreshed every 24 hours.

Unknown Host hosts The Patentlytics Podcast, a general show with 0 episodes published.

Our AI reads these to draft pitches. Use them as grounding for a pitch that cites a real guest and a specific topic.

• 

  The Patentlytics Podcast

  Episode 7: The Number Is Negative, a Rising Tide of Restriction Requirements, and 17 RCEs

  May 10, 202611 minS0

  <p>Restriction requirements have been climbing every month since January, and we have three theories about why, none of them comforting. And a financial method application filed in 2001, by the same company as last week's case, that has survived Alice, a PTAB loss, and 17 requests for continued examination. Normally, in this segment, we tell you how much patent life is left. This week is different. Plus, can you guess this week's Obvious to Whom combination?</p>

  ListenShow Notes
• 

  The Patentlytics Podcast

  Episode 6: No Battery, No Mercy, and Nineteen Years of Rejections

  May 5, 202611 minS0

  <p>This week: the patent classification section that exists outside the rules and the batteryless implantable chip that earned its spot there. An examiner who combined a phone microphone, a noise filter, and a brain-computer interface and called the result inevitable. And a financial method application with a title that means something very different on Google, a PTAB loss, fifteen RCEs, and an expiration date that's closer than you'd think.</p>

  ListenShow Notes
• 

  The Patentlytics Podcast

  Episode 5: The 88,684-Word Office Action, Twelve Years to Allowance, and the One-Step Method That Won't Evolve

  Apr 26, 20268 minS0

  <p>The longest Office Action issued this week runs 190 pages and 88,684 words, longer than three classic novels, with a single obviousness combination that takes up 148 pages and a Response to Arguments section that wraps up in four lines. The longest-pending case to receive an allowance this week took 148.4 months, two appeals, and two trips to the PTAB to get there. And finally: a fibroblast treatment method filed in May 2014 with a single claim step that spent eleven years cycling through seven rounds of amendments, a failed appeal, and a full claim cancellation, only to arrive in 2025 with a new independent...

  ListenShow Notes
• 

  The Patentlytics Podcast

  Episode 4: The Toy Examiner's 101 Problem, An Incomplete Restriction, and the Bank That Stopped Filing

  Apr 20, 202614 minS0

  <p>A mechanical art unit covering games and toys is issuing patent eligibility rejections at 63.6%, more than three times the group average and nearly double the next closest unit, with no clean explanation. Thirteen art units issued Office Actions this week without allowing a single application. Then, a restriction requirement that demands an election without telling the applicant what they're choosing between. And finally, a bank that filed a check-processing patent in October 2007, survived the financial crisis, got blindsided by Alice, appealed to the PTAB, lost on 101, won on 103, and is still in prosecution 18 years later while the Dow has...

  ListenShow Notes
• 

  The Patentlytics Podcast

  Episode 3: The 20% Mystery, Obviousness Gymnastics, and the Application That Won't Die

  Apr 12, 202614 minS0

  <p>Design patent allowances swung from 80% to 20% of the top art units in a single week and Office Actions dropped 20% in the same stretch. Two unexplained data anomalies, no clean answers. Then: a 103 rejection that leans on a 1993 handwriting converter to block a modern short-term rental listing tool. And finally, a patent application filed in June 2001 that is still in prosecution, tracing how Alice, a missed terminal disclaimer window, and 25 years of shifting 101 doctrine turned a retirement income method into a two-page claim.</p>

  ListenShow Notes

Based on semantic analysis of episode topics and host coverage, this show is a strong guest fit for executives in:

Industry fit is computed by PitchCentric using vector embeddings of the show's episode catalog.