Hosted by Unknown Host · 🇺🇸 US · EN-US · 542 episodes
Established thought leaders with verified media credentials.
Following what the Supreme Court is actually doing can be daunting. Reporting on the subject is often only done within the context of political narratives of the day -- and following the Court's decisions and reading every new case can be a non-starter. The purpose of this Podcast is to make it as easy as possible for members of the public to source information about what is happening at the Supreme Court. For that reason, we read every Opinion Syllabus without any commentary whatsoever. Further, there are no advertisements or sponsors. We call it "information sourcing," and we hope that the podcast is a useful resource for members of the public who want to understand the legal issues of the day, prospective law students who want to get to know legal language and understand good legal writing, and attorneys who can use the podcast to be better advocates for their clients. *Note this podcast is for informational and educational purposes only.
Unknown Host hosts Supreme Court Decision Syllabus (SCOTUS Podcast), a government show with 542 episodes published.
Send us Fan Mail 1. Title IX allows schools to provide separate women’s and men’s sports teams defined by biological sex, and West Virginia has permissibly maintained female sports for biological females consistent with
Send us Fan Mail In NRSC v. FEC the Supreme Court granted Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit to answer the question of whether the limits imposed by the Federal Election Campaign Act (
Send us Fan Mail In Trump v. Barbara , the Supreme Court held that children born in the U.S. to parents unlawfully or temporarily present are citizens at birth under the Fourteenth Amendment, striking down Trump's execut
Send us Fan Mail Children born in the United States to parents unlawfully or temporarily present are “subject to the jurisdiction” of the United States and are citizens at birth under the Fourteenth Amendment’s Citizensh
Send us Fan Mail Police officers conducted a Fourth Amendment search when they acquired Chatrie’s location data from Google because an individual has a reasonable expectation of privacy in his cell-phone location informa
Send us Fan Mail The federal election-day statutes do not prevent Mississippi from counting absentee ballots postmarked by election day but received up to five days thereafter; nothing in the federal election-day statute
Send us Fan Mail In Trump v. Cook , the Supreme Court denied the Government's application to stay an injunction reinstating Federal Reserve Governor Lisa Cook, whom President Trump had fired over alleged mortgage fraud p
Send us Fan Mail In Trump v. Slaughter , the Supreme Court held that the FTC's for-cause removal protection for its Commissioners violates the separation of powers, overruling Humphrey's Executor v. United States (1935)
Send us Fan Mail In Monsanto Co. v. Durnell , the Supreme Court held that FIFRA expressly preempts a state-law failure-to-warn claim demanding a cancer warning on Roundup's label, since the EPA had approved the label wit
Send us Fan Mail The TPS statute bars judicial review of non-constitutional claims. Support the show
Send us Fan Mail In Mullin v. Al Otro Lado , the Supreme Court held that an alien standing in Mexico does not "arrive in the United States" within the meaning of the Immigration and Nationality Act by attempting and fail
Send us Fan Mail In Blanche v. Lau , the Supreme Court held that the Immigration and Nationality Act does not require a border officer to have clear and convincing evidence that a lawful permanent resident has committed
Send us Fan Mail The Helms-Burton Act itself abrogates the sovereign immunity of Cuban agencies and instrumentalities Support the show
Send us Fan Mail Hawaii's rules about not allowing people to concealed carry on private property unless the owner posts consent is unconstitutional. Support the show
Send us Fan Mail Individuals may not be held liable in their personal capacities under a Spending Clause statute unless those individuals have voluntarily and knowingly consented to answer lawsuits under the statute; bec
Send us Fan Mail The proper baseline for measuring “just compensation” following a tax sale is the auction sale price, not the property’s hypothetical fair market value, at least when the sale is fairly conducted in ligh
Send us Fan Mail The Supreme Court held that federal courts may no longer create new causes of action for violations of international law under the Alien Tort Statute, effectively closing the narrow door that Sosa v. Alv
Send us Fan Mail In a per curiam decision, the Supreme Court summarily reversed the Second Circuit’s grant of federal habeas relief to Pedro Hernandez, who was convicted of kidnapping and felony murder in the 1979 disapp
Send us Fan Mail We speak today to say...nothing has changed... Support the show
Send us Fan Mail Because a criminal law appeal waiver must be both knowingly and voluntary a waiver of ineffective assistance of counsel is not really possible. Support the show
Sponsor detection runs nightly. Check back soon.
No public pitch examples yet for this show.
Generate your own personalised pitchBased on semantic analysis of episode topics and host coverage, this show is a strong guest fit for executives in:
Industry fit is computed by PitchCentric using vector embeddings of the show's episode catalog.
Shows with the most semantically similar episode content. Pitch one, pitch all; producers cluster.
Supreme Court Decision Syllabus (SCOTUS Podcast) has a verified contact on file. Create a free PitchCentric account to access it and generate a personalised pitch in seconds. Research at least 3 recent episodes first and lead with a specific angle that serves their government audience.
Supreme Court Decision Syllabus (SCOTUS Podcast) is hosted by Unknown Host. The show is categorised under government (education) and has published 542 episodes.
Supreme Court Decision Syllabus (SCOTUS Podcast) has published 542 episodes.
Supreme Court Decision Syllabus (SCOTUS Podcast) regularly covers government, education, news. It sits in the government category, with a education focus.
Supreme Court Decision Syllabus (SCOTUS Podcast) is accessible for guests with genuine government expertise. A personalised, episode-aware pitch will still outperform a generic one every time.
Supreme Court Decision Syllabus (SCOTUS Podcast) hasn't explicitly signalled guest openness in recent episodes. That doesn't rule out pitching. your hook just needs to be especially compelling and relevant to their recent content.
Episodes of Supreme Court Decision Syllabus (SCOTUS Podcast) average 11 minutes. a focused format where a clear narrative arc and tight preparation matter most.
Our data rates Supreme Court Decision Syllabus (SCOTUS Podcast)'s guest bar at 80/100 (Premium tier). Established thought leaders with verified media credentials. Sign in to PitchCentric to see how your own Pod Score compares against this show.
Methodology. Booking Probability™ blends Listen Score, 30-day Virality, open-to-guests detection, and Apple ratings. Data refreshed every 60 minutes. Listen Score and Booking Probability are calculated by PitchCentric. Last enriched 5 days ago.
