
Ep. 34. In which we consider Chapter 1 of Magnifica Humanitas.


Sub Deo et Lege is an online commonplace, a means of drawing from and carrying on the Catholic intellectual tradition. We invite lawyers, judges, students, professors, and wayfarers from all walks of life to join in the conversation. Sub Deo is supported by the Project on Constitutional Originalism and the Catholic Intellectual Tradition at Columbus School of Law, The Catholic University of America.
Required Pod Score for this podcast. PitchCentric checks your profile against host openness, topical fit, and audience signals before you generate a pitch.
Contact path
Verified email
Booking probability
31%
Guest openness
Selective
Sign up to generate a grounded pitch for Sub Deo et Lege.
Signup to Generate a PitchSub Deo et Lege is an online commonplace, a means of drawing from and carrying on the Catholic intellectual tradition. We invite lawyers, judges, students, professors, and wayfarers from all walks of life to join in the conversation.
Recent episodes include "Ep. 34. In which we consider Chapter 1 of Magnifica Humanitas." (9 June 2026, 51 minutes), "Ep. 33. In which we consider for the first time together Magnifica Humanitas." (27 May 2026, 49 minutes), and "Ep. 32. In which we discuss proposed assisted suicide legislation for Virginia." (9 March 2026, 47 minutes).
Sub Deo et Lege publishes roughly monthly, with episodes averaging 47 minutes across 35 episodes.
Booking probability for Sub Deo et Lege is 31%, and the host is rated Selective on guests. Sub Deo et Lege requires a Pod Score of 80 or higher. Sub Deo et Lege's contact route on record: verified email.
The strongest fits for Sub Deo et Lege are Law & Legal Services. Sub Deo et Lege has an education audience.
Sub Deo et Lege is an education podcast with 35 episodes published.
Our AI reads these to draft pitches. Use them as grounding for a pitch that cites a real guest and a specific topic.

Ep. 34. In which we consider Chapter 1 of Magnifica Humanitas.

Ep. 33. In which we consider for the first time together Magnifica Humanitas.

Ep. 32. In which we discuss proposed assisted suicide legislation for Virginia.

Ep. 31. In which we discuss legal essences and "religion" in a recent case.

Ep. 30. In which we reflect on what Catholics believe about the roots of law and rights.

Sub Deo et Lege
Ep. 29. In which we discuss a new moment of civic renewal in higher education with Lee Strang.

Ep. 28. In which we discuss establishment, disestablishment, conscience, and conformity with Prof. Nathan Chapman in relation to his book with Prof. Michael McConnell.

Ep. 27. In which we discuss Providence and godlessness in America with Professor Steven Smith in his new book.

Ep. 26. In which we offer some guarded rapid reactions in real-time to the opinions on the last day of the Supreme Court’s term.

Ep. 25. In which we discuss what a required Jurisprudence course in a Catholic law school just might be today.

Ep. 24. In which we go "old school" once again to discuss a new book by an old friend on the dark secrets of lethal injection.

Ep. 23. In which we reflect on the legal categories of status, conduct, belief, and message with an old friend.

Ep. 22 In which we discuss Section 25 of the Judiciary Act of 1789 and Calder v. Bull in light of an upcoming symposium in Connecticut.

Ep. 21. In which we reflect on ABA accreditation requirements and the semiotics of group academic letters.

Ep. 20. In which we converse with representatives of the Catholic Law faculty "youth movement" while they roam abroad presenting scholarly papers.

Ep. 19. In which we discuss with Mary Catherine Martin what Virginia can learn from the process that led to Missouri's "Death Star" Amendment 3.

Ep. 18. In which we consider whether Rahimi was right in relation to the rise of modern judicial review as explained by Prof. Christopher Wolfe.

Ep. 17. In which we welcome our Columbus Law colleague and friend Prof. Joel Alicea to discuss his forthcoming law review article, Bruen Was Right.

Episode #16
Ep. 16. In which we commend lawyers to read Thomas Hobbes, and we acknowledge Charlemagne the Dog.

Recent guests on Sub Deo et Lege. Study who booked and why before you pitch.
PitchCentric classifies Sub Deo et Lege under these industries. Guests from them are the closest fit, and each links to the best podcasts in that industry.
Shows with the most semantically similar episode content. Pitch one, pitch all; producers cluster.
Is this podcast yours and you'd like to remove or correct details? Request removal or email privacy@pitchcentric.com.
Questions about the free trial? See the pricing FAQ