Hosted by Charles Usen · 🇺🇸 US · EN · 97 episodes
Established thought leaders with verified media credentials.
This podcast brings you inside real federal appellate courtrooms, where lawyers present live, time-limited arguments and judges test the strength of each side’s case. Each episode features unedited audio of arguments that supplement written briefs, giving listeners a front-row seat to how panels question counsel, clarify contested legal issues, and shape the law in areas ranging from civil rights to business disputes and criminal appeals.
Charles Usen hosts Oral Arguments from the U.S. Court of Appeals, a government show with 97 episodes published.
Case Summary: In the case of Yinnv Liu v. Monthly (Docket No. 25-2074), argued before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit on February 20, 2026 , the relevant facts are as follows: Fact Summary The litigatio
Show notes
In the case of Dickerson v. BPP PCV Owners LLC (Docket No. 24-3147), argued before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit on February 20, 2026 , the relevant facts are as follows: The litigation was initiated b
Show notes
In the case of Immanuel Baptist Church v. City of Chicago (Docket No. 25-1951), argued before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit on February 20, 2026 , the relevant facts are as follows: The litigation was
Show notes
Case Summary: Gemini said In the case of Damri v. LivePerson, Inc. (Docket No. 25-964), argued before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit on February 20, 2026 , the relevant facts are as follows: Fact Summar
Show notes
Case Summary: In the case of David McDonald v. Trustees of Indiana University (Docket No. 25-2366), argued before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit on February 19, 2026 , the relevant facts are as follows
Show notesCase Summary: In the case of Kenithia Alston v. District of Columbia (Docket No. 25-7056), argued before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit on February 19, 2026 , the relevant facts are as fol
Show notes
Case Summary: In the case of Norton Outdoor Advertising, Inc. v. Village of St. Bernard, OH (Docket No. 25-3265), argued before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit on February 18, 2026 , the relevant facts ar
Show notes
Case Summary: In the case of Abadi v. Greyhound Lines, Inc. (Docket No. 25-38), argued before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit on February 18, 2026 , the relevant facts are as follows: The litigation was
Show notes
Case Summary: In the case of Reginald Chapman v. Eileen O'Neill Burke (Docket No. 25-1311), argued before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit on February 18, 2026 , the relevant facts are as follows: The li
Show notes
Case Summary: In the case of Jewel Sanitary Napkins, LLC v. Busy Beaver Publications, LLC (Docket No. 25-1905), argued before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit on February 17, 2026 , the relevant facts ar
Show notes
Case Summary: Gemini said In the case of Kimberly Ballard v. Ameren Illinois Company (Docket No. 25-1562), argued before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit on February 17, 2026 , the relevant facts are as
Show notes
Case Summary: In the case of Oldnar Corp v. Sanyo North America Corp (Docket No. 25-1336), argued before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit on February 17, 2026 , the relevant facts are as follows: The litig
Show notes
Case Summary: In the case of Schwetz v. The Board of Cooperative Educational Services (BOCES) of Nassau County (Docket No. 24-2957), argued before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit on February 13, 2026 , t
Show notes
Case Summary: Gemini said In the case of United States v. Shaquiel Mendez (Docket No. 25-2127), argued before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit on February 13, 2026 , the relevant facts are as follows: The
Show notes
Case Summary: In the case of Cornett v. Banks (Docket No. 25-830), which was argued before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit on February 13, 2026 , the relevant facts are as follows: The litigation was ini
Show notes
Case Summary: In the case of Laura Revolinsky v. Bayer Corporation (Docket No. 25-2401), argued before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit on February 13, 2026 , the relevant facts are as follows: The litig
Show notes
Case Summary: In the case of Gary Betts v. Boone County, Illinois (Docket No. 25-1685), argued before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit on February 13, 2026 , the relevant facts are as follows: The litiga
Show notes
Case Summary: In the case of C.B. v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Illinois (Docket No. 25-1323), argued before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit on February 12, 2026 , the relevant facts are as follows:
Show notes
Case Summary: Gemini said In the case of Montana-Dakota Utilities Co. v. FERC (Docket No. 25-1007), argued before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit on February 12, 2026 , the relevant facts are as follows:
Show notesSponsor detection runs nightly. Check back soon.
No public pitch examples yet for this show.
Generate your own personalised pitchBased on semantic analysis of episode topics and host coverage, this show is a strong guest fit for executives in:
Industry fit is computed by PitchCentric using vector embeddings of the show's episode catalog.
Shows with the most semantically similar episode content. Pitch one, pitch all; producers cluster.
To pitch Oral Arguments from the U.S. Court of Appeals, visit https://rss.com/podcasts/oral-arguments-from-the-u-s-court-of-appeals for contact information, then craft a tight one-paragraph hook that ties your expertise to a gap in their recent government coverage.
Oral Arguments from the U.S. Court of Appeals is hosted by Charles Usen. The show is categorised under government and has published 97 episodes.
Oral Arguments from the U.S. Court of Appeals has published 97 episodes.
Oral Arguments from the U.S. Court of Appeals regularly covers government. It sits in the government category.
Oral Arguments from the U.S. Court of Appeals is accessible for guests with genuine government expertise. A personalised, episode-aware pitch will still outperform a generic one every time.
Oral Arguments from the U.S. Court of Appeals hasn't explicitly signalled guest openness in recent episodes. That doesn't rule out pitching. your hook just needs to be especially compelling and relevant to their recent content.
Episodes of Oral Arguments from the U.S. Court of Appeals average 24 minutes. a focused format where a clear narrative arc and tight preparation matter most.
Our data rates Oral Arguments from the U.S. Court of Appeals's guest bar at 80/100 (Premium tier). Established thought leaders with verified media credentials. Sign in to PitchCentric to see how your own Pod Score compares against this show.
Methodology. Booking Probability™ blends Listen Score, 30-day Virality, open-to-guests detection, and Apple ratings. Data refreshed every 60 minutes. Listen Score and Booking Probability are calculated by PitchCentric. Last enriched 13 days ago.
