Get in the Game Podcast from Jury Analyst

Award-winning trial lawyers and scientists interview other innovative legal practitioners on important strategies that lift the legal community to higher standards.

Get in the Game Podcast from Jury Analyst is a education podcast hosted by Brian Panish, with 60 episodes on record and a Required Pod Score of 80. PitchCentric scores this show on Booking Probability, Listen Score, and live audience signals refreshed every 24 hours.

Brian Panish hosts Get in the Game Podcast from Jury Analyst, a education show with 60 episodes published.

Our AI reads these to draft pitches. Use them as grounding for a pitch that cites a real guest and a specific topic.

• 

  Episode #7

  Building the Advantage Early (best of)

  Jun 24, 202647 minS5

  Send us Fan Mail This Best of Get in the Game episode brings together standout insights from leading plaintiff trial attorneys on what it really takes to prepare, frame, and try high-stakes cases. Featuring clips from Rex Parris, Dale Galipo, Ben Cloward, Keith Mitnik, John Uustal, Arash Homampour, Benjamin Crump, Russell Nicolet, and others, this episode highlights the practical trial wisdom, preparation habits, and courtroom strategies that shape powerful plaintiff advocacy. What This Episode Covers How jurors read lawyers, clients, and the courtroom before testimony begins Why simple, direct storytelling matters in the age of short attention spans How to address bad facts, bias, and juror skepticism early Why focus groups and mock juries help reveal hidden case weaknesses How voir dire can uncover subtle bias without making jurors defensive Why opening statements must give jurors context for the evidence How authenticity, visual storytelling, and damages confidence shape persuasion Why venue-specific preparation matters in serious plaintiff cases How collaboration within the plaintiff bar strengthens trial strategy

  ListenShow Notes
• 

  Episode #6

  Best of Get in the Game: Masterclass in Trial Strategy

  Apr 6, 202643 minS5

  Send us Fan Mail The idea that one piece of evidence wins a case is a myth. The trial lawyers securing the most significant verdicts today operate with a different understanding. Jurors do not decide cases based on facts alone. They decide based on how those facts are framed, sequenced, and ultimately understood. This episode distills insights from some of the most respected plaintiff trial lawyers in the country, all featured on Get in the Game with Brian Panish . It highlights the strategic shift from instinct-driven advocacy to structured, data-informed trial preparation. In this episode, you’ll learn: Why evidence alone is not persuasive without the right interpretive framework How sequencing and narrative architecture influence liability decisions What jurors retain and why most information is lost without structure How leading trial teams use focus groups and behavioral data to test cases in advance Why traditional emotional appeals can limit damages instead of increasing them How to position damages as a question of value and justice, not just compensation Featuring insights from: Ben Cloward Keith Mitnik John Taylor Arash Homampour Dale Galipo Rex Parris Russell Nicolet John Uustal Benjamin Crump Each of these trial lawyers has been featured on Get in the Game with Brian Panish , where they break down their approach to high-stakes litigation and verdict strategy. 👉 Explore their full conversations in their respective episodes: https://getinthegame.juryanalyst.com/

  ListenShow Notes
• 

  Get in the Game Podcast from Jury Analyst

  Science of Justice -Preview Episode 23

  Sep 15, 20251 minS5

  Send us Fan Mail The upcoming podcast from our sister department group discusses a significant shift in how legal trials are prepared , indicating a departure from past methods. This transformation is driven by the emergence of advanced tools , which are fundamentally changing the approach to trial readiness. As a result, a growing disparity is observed between conventional, often experience-based preparation and newer, scientifically-backed methodologies . Relying on outdated, anecdotal strategies is becoming increasingly disadvantageous as more sophisticated, data-driven techniques gain prominence in the legal field. https://scienceofjustice.com/

  ListenShow Notes
• 

  Episode #5

  The Watchdog Files -Brian's Consumer Perspective

  Jul 23, 202540 minS5

  Send us Fan Mail Brian Panish interviews Carmen Balber, the Executive Director of Consumer Watchdog , a nonprofit organization focused on protecting the interests of consumers and holding corporations accountable. Carmen has been a powerful voice in the fight for consumer rights, particularly in the areas of insurance, healthcare, and corporate responsibility.

  ListenShow Notes
• 

  Episode #4

  Essential Wisdom for Rising Attorneys

  May 26, 202515 minS5

  Send us Fan Mail What separates truly exceptional trial lawyers from the rest? It's rarely what they teach in law school. Six accomplished courtroom veterans—Brian Panish, Sean Flaherty, Keith Mitnick, Jason Leonard, John Ustall, and Joshua Koskoff—share candid insights drawn from decades of high-stakes litigation. Their collective wisdom forms a practical roadmap for attorneys at any stage, but especially those working to establish themselves in the challenging world of trial advocacy. The journey begins earlier than many realize. These attorneys emphasize the transformative power of immersing yourself in legal practice during law school, absorbing the unwritten rules and developing intuitive skills through proximity and observation. Yet they remain refreshingly honest about the timeline—expect to "tread water" for several years before hitting your stride. Even veterans with decades of experience admit to experiencing pre-trial anxiety. The difference? They've learned to function effectively despite it. For new lawyers preparing for their first courtroom experiences, the advice challenges conventional wisdom. Perfection isn't necessary—authenticity is. When you thoroughly prepare and genuinely believe in your case, minor technical imperfections actually make you more relatable to jurors. This permission to be human while maintaining high professional standards liberates attorneys to focus on what truly matters: thorough preparation, strategic case framing, and passionate advocacy. Beyond the courtroom, success requires intentional networking, exceptional client service, and embracing collaborative approaches. The strongest advocates recognize that mentorship and knowledge-sharing create collective strength against well-resourced opponents. Through every challenge, maintaining your authentic voice while incorporating lessons from those who came before creates a sustainable foundation for a meaningful career in trial law. Ready to transform your approach to trial advocacy? Subscribe now for more practical insights from the profession's most accomplished practitioners.

  ListenShow Notes

Based on semantic analysis of episode topics and host coverage, this show is a strong guest fit for executives in:

Industry fit is computed by PitchCentric using vector embeddings of the show's episode catalog.