PitchCentric
Excited Utterance podcast artwork

education

Excited Utterance

Hosted by Ed Cheng / Alex Nunn · education · EN

Apple PodcastsWebsite

About this Podcast:

Excited Utterance is a legal podcast that interviews authors of new or forthcoming legal scholarship in the areas of evidence and proof.

Pitch Analysis

Required Pod Score for this podcast. PitchCentric checks your profile against host openness, topical fit, and audience signals before you generate a pitch.

Contact path

Verified email

Booking probability

36%

Guest openness

Selective

Verified email on file
80/100
Required Score

Sign up to generate a grounded pitch for Excited Utterance.

Signup to Generate a Pitch

Questions about Excited Utterance

What is Excited Utterance about?

Excited Utterance is a legal podcast that interviews authors of new or forthcoming legal scholarship in the areas of evidence and proof.

Who hosts Excited Utterance?

Excited Utterance is hosted by Ed Cheng / Alex Nunn. The show has published 183 episodes to date.

What has Excited Utterance covered recently?

Recent episodes include "183 Justin Sevier" (26 October 2026), "182 Erin Sheley" (12 October 2026), and "181 Hillel Bavli" (28 September 2026).

How often does Excited Utterance publish?

Excited Utterance publishes roughly every two weeks across 183 episodes.

How hard is it to get booked on Excited Utterance?

Booking probability for Excited Utterance is 36%, and the host is rated Selective on guests. Excited Utterance requires a Pod Score of 80 or higher. Excited Utterance's contact route on record: verified email.

Who should pitch Excited Utterance?

The strongest fits for Excited Utterance are Law & Legal Services and Universities & Colleges. Excited Utterance has an education audience.

About the host

Ed Cheng / Alex Nunn hosts Excited Utterance, an education podcast with 183 episodes published.

Verified host email: ████████@████.comSign in to unlock →

Recent episodes

Our AI reads these to draft pitches. Use them as grounding for a pitch that cites a real guest and a specific topic.

  • Episode #183

    183 Justin Sevier

    Oct 26, 2026—

    The Authentication Illusion. Justin Sevier from Florida State University discusses new psychological research investigating whether legal actors are up to the task of authentication in an era of deepfake images, audio...

  • Excited Utterance

    182 Erin Sheley

    Oct 12, 2026—

    Testimonial Gossip. Erin Sheley from the University of San Diego argues that under the Supreme Court's decision in Smith v. Arizona, offering reputational character evidence against the accused in criminal cases may...

  • Excited Utterance

    181 Hillel Bavli

    Sep 28, 2026—

    Trial by Character. Hillel Bavli from Southern Methodist University discusses how some courts misinterpret the "other purposes" discussed in Rule 404(b)(2) as true exceptions, causing an erosion of the well-accepted...

  • Excited Utterance

    179 Laurent Sacharoff

    Aug 31, 2026—

    The Accused Speaks. Laurent Sacharoff from Hofstra University uncovers the original meaning of the "right to be heard," a historical constitutional right to give unsworn statements not subject to cross-examination...

  • Apr 27, 2026—S0

    The Overlooked Witness Memory Risk. Sue Provenzano from Georgia State University and Sarah Brown-Schmidt from Vanderbilt University discuss the problem of “hear-witnesses,” witnesses who report about what was previously...

View More
  • Excited Utterance

    177 Kay Levine

    Apr 14, 2026—S0

    Opinion Surveys Across the Civil-Criminal Divide. Kay Levine from Emory University discusses the uses of opinion survey evidence, how its admissibility is inconsistent between civil and criminal contexts, and perhaps...

  • Excited Utterance

    176 Mary Fan

    Mar 30, 2026—S0

    AI-Enhanced Evidence Law. Mary Fan from the University of Washington discusses the challenges of AI-enhanced evidence in the courtroom, how to ensure its reliability, and concerns about disparities between...

  • Excited Utterance

    175 Rebecca Wexler

    Mar 16, 2026—S0

    Law Enforcement Privilege. Rebecca Wexler from Columbia Law School discusses the privilege governing police investigative methods, the reasons for the privilege, as well as its costs to transparency and the ability to...

  • Excited Utterance

    174 Edith Beerdsen

    Mar 2, 2026—S0

    Strategy for Strategy's Sake. Edith Beerdsen from Temple University asks whether strategic or "sporting" behavior has any place in a system of legal proof, and when being clever goes too far.

  • Feb 16, 2026—S0

    Antiracist Expert Evidence. Asess Bhasin from the University of Maryland and Jasmine Gonzales Rose from Boston University discuss the ways in which expert evidence can address racism and racial discrimination in our...

  • Excited Utterance

    172 Laura Savarese

    Feb 2, 2026—S0

    Children and the Making of Modern Evidence Law. Laura Savarese from Michigan State University discusses the role of children’s testimony and nineteenth-century child protection laws in the development of the law of...

  • Excited Utterance

    171 Alfred Yen

    Nov 3, 2025—S0

    The Evidentiary Use and Misuse of Forensic Musicology in Copyright Litigation. Fred Yen from Boston College discusses the use of musicology experts in copyright litigation and what they should and should not be...

  • Excited Utterance

    170 Brandon Garrett

    Oct 20, 2025—S0

    Defending Due Process. Brandon Garrett from Duke University discusses his new book, Defending Due Process: Why Fairness Matters in a Polarized World.

  • Excited Utterance

    169 Yan Fang

    Oct 6, 2025—S0

    Internet Technology Companies as Evidence Intermediaries. Yan Fang discusses the modern role of internet technology companies as significant repositories of evidence and how these companies fulfill their legal...

  • Excited Utterance

    168 Avani Mehta Sood

    Sep 22, 2025—S0

    Verdict Format on Trial. Avani Sood from NYU discusses the use of special verdicts in criminal cases, and why perhaps we should favor them instead of the traditional general verdict.

  • Excited Utterance

    167 Jack Whiteley

    Sep 8, 2025—S0

    The Three-Verdict Problem. Jack Whiteley from the University of Minnesota discusses the Scottish tripartite system of jury verdicts, featuring verdicts of guilty, not guilty, and not proven.

  • Excited Utterance

    166 Daniel Medwed

    Aug 25, 2025—S0

    Dan Medwed from Northeastern University discusses the past, present, and future of Chambers v. Mississippi and the right to present a defense.

  • Excited Utterance

    165 Hayley Stillwell

    Apr 7, 2025—S0

    Placebo Trials. Hayley Stillwell from the University of Oklahoma proposes the use of "placebo trials," test trials in which the alleged defendant is known to be innocent, to learn about jury dynamics and the empirical...

  • Excited Utterance

    164 Stephen Simon

    Mar 24, 2025—S0

    Value Judgments and the Fact-Law Distinction. Stephen Simon from the University of Richmond offers a new perspective on the time-honored law-fact distinction.

  • Excited Utterance

    163 Tomer Kenneth

    Mar 10, 2025—S0

    In Defense of Factual Precedents. Tomer Kenneth from the University of Southern California discusses the evidentiary problem of general facts that are applicable across multiple cases, and whether there should be...

Recent guests

Recent guests on Excited Utterance. Study who booked and why before you pitch.

Best industries to pitch Excited Utterance for

PitchCentric classifies Excited Utterance under these industries. Guests from them are the closest fit, and each links to the best podcasts in that industry.

Similar Podcasts

Shows with the most semantically similar episode content. Pitch one, pitch all; producers cluster.

Podcasts like Excited Utterance

Is this podcast yours and you'd like to remove or correct details? Request removal or email privacy@pitchcentric.com.

Questions about the free trial? See the pricing FAQ