
ハーバーマス:知識、合理性、公共圏
Habermas, J. (1962). 公共性の構造転換 [Strukturwandel der Öffentlichkeit]. 東京: 未來社. Habermas, J. (1981). コミュニケーション的行為の理論 [Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns]. 東京: 未來社. Habermas, J. (1991). 討議倫理 [Diskursethik]. 東京: 未來社. 上田, 知夫.
Show notes
Hosted by puR6 · 🇺🇸 US · JA · 28 episodes
Established thought leaders with verified media credentials.
組織についての研究事例を、AIを用いて分かりやすく解説します。注)本ポッドキャストは営利目的ではなく個人的な趣味で作成しています。
puR6 hosts Knowledge Management -by AI-, a business show with 28 episodes published.

Habermas, J. (1962). 公共性の構造転換 [Strukturwandel der Öffentlichkeit]. 東京: 未來社. Habermas, J. (1981). コミュニケーション的行為の理論 [Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns]. 東京: 未來社. Habermas, J. (1991). 討議倫理 [Diskursethik]. 東京: 未來社. 上田, 知夫.
Show notes
Rahman, A., Sakurai, A., & Munadi, K. (2017). Indigenous knowledge management to enhance community resilience to tsunami risk: lessons learned from Smong traditions in Simeulue island, Indonesia. IOP Conference Series: E
Show notes
甲斐 尚人, 技術マニュアルにおける文の曖昧さを解消する図表の役割に関する分析, 情報知識学会誌, 2022, 32 巻, 3 号, p. 329-338, 公開日 2022/10/21, [早期公開] 公開日 2022/05/13, Online ISSN 1881-7661, Print ISSN 0917-1436, https://doi.org/10.2964/jsik_2022_006, https://www.jstage
Show notes
Cidade, D. F., Bissani, M., & Oliveira, M. (n.d.). The Relationship Between Remote Work, Knowledge Sharing and Knowledge Hiding.
Show notes
Iwao, S., & Kato, Y. (2022). Inter-organizational knowledge sharing and creation in Toyota Group. Production Management, 29(1), 7–17. https://doi.org/10.14846/seisankanri.29.1_7
Show notes
有田博之, 橋本禅, 友正達美, 小野邦雄, 福与徳文, 中島正裕, 内川義行, 千葉克己, 落合基継, 郷古雅春, 田村孝浩, & 服部俊宏. (2020). 大規模震災復旧・復興時における現場知の組織的記録の提案 —— 東日本大震災における農業農村整備分野での試みを参考として [Proposal for systematic recording of on-site knowledge in large-scale disaster
Show notes
Shultz, R. H., Jr. (2012). Organizational learning and the Marine Corps: The counterinsurgency campaign in Iraq (CIWAG case study series 2011-2012). U.S. Naval War College, Center on Irregular Warfare and Armed Groups. h
Show notes
Chang, W. J. (2014). Buddhism and knowledge management: A practical framework for integrating Eastern wisdom and Western management. Journal of Human Values, 20(4), 321–334. https://doi.org/10.1177/0971685814544543 Guill
Show notes
1. 飲みニケーションは本当に必要なのか?仕事の効率と日本と海外の比較から考える, https://note.com/8ightlab/n/nff84b76de941 2. 飲みニケーションとは?必要性や代替案、コロナ禍による変化について解説,
Show notes

Frischmann, B. M., Madison, M. J., & Strandburg, K. J. (Eds.). (2014). Governing knowledge commons: Introduction & Chapter 1. Oxford University Press. Retrieved from https://scholarship.law.pitt.edu/fac_book-chapters/8 
Show notes
Corrocher, N., & Lenzi, C. (2022). Exploring the sources of knowledge diversity in founding teams and its impact on new firms’ innovation. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 32, 1091–1118. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00191-
Show notes
Dyson, T., & Pashchuk, Y. (2022). Organisational learning during the Donbas War: the development of Ukrainian Armed Forces lessons-learned processes. Defence Studies, 22(2), 141–167. https://doi.org/10.1080/14702436.2022
Show notes
Roberts, J.. (2013). Organizational ignorance: Towards a managerial perspective on the unknown. *Management Learning, 44(3), 215–232. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350507612471920 Jalonen, H., & others. (2024). Ignorance in o
Show notes
Nielsen, S. C. (2010). *An Army Transformed: The U.S. Army's Post-Vietnam Recovery and the Dynamics of Change in Military Organizations*. US Army War College Press. https://press.armywarcollege.edu/monographs/343 [1] Van
Show notes
ミシェル・フーコー. (1966). 言葉と物(渡辺一民・佐々木明 訳). 新潮社. (原著 Les mots et les choses) https://www.shinchosha.co.jp/book/ ミシェル・フーコー. (1969). 知の考古学(中村雄二郎 訳). 河出文庫. (原著 L’archéologie du savoir) https://www.kawade.co.jp/ ミシェル・フーコー. (1975).
Show notes
トークンインセンティブと知識共有 Zheng, X., Yan, X., Li, L., & Wang, W. (2023). Blockchain tokens for enterprise knowledge sharing: Incentive and penalty mechanisms based on system dynamics. Journal of Organizational and End User Comput
Show notes
経済産業省 大臣官房 若手新政策プロジェクト PIVOT. (2025, 4月 30日). デジタル経済レポート: データに飲み込まれる世界、聖域なきデジタル市場の生存戦略.
Show notes
Böhm, K., & Durst, S. (2025). Knowledge management in the age of generative artificial intelligence – from SECI to GRAI. VINE Journal of Information and Knowledge Management Systems. https://doi.org/10.1108/VJIKMS-10-202
Show notes
Kaczorowska-Spychalska, D., Kotula, N., Mazurek, G., & Sułkowski, Ł. (2024). Generative AI as source of change of knowledge management paradigm. Human Technology, 20(1), 131–154. https://doi.org/10.14254/1795-6889.2024.2
Show notesSponsor detection runs nightly. Check back soon.
No public pitch examples yet for this show.
Generate your own personalised pitchShows with the most semantically similar episode content. Pitch one, pitch all; producers cluster.
To pitch Knowledge Management -by AI-, visit https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/kawamura-jun for contact information, then craft a tight one-paragraph hook that ties your expertise to a gap in their recent business coverage.
Knowledge Management -by AI- is hosted by puR6. The show is categorised under business and has published 28 episodes.
Knowledge Management -by AI- has published 28 episodes.
Knowledge Management -by AI- regularly covers business. It sits in the business category.
Knowledge Management -by AI- is accessible for guests with genuine business expertise. A personalised, episode-aware pitch will still outperform a generic one every time.
Knowledge Management -by AI- hasn't explicitly signalled guest openness in recent episodes. That doesn't rule out pitching. your hook just needs to be especially compelling and relevant to their recent content.
Episodes of Knowledge Management -by AI- average 21 minutes. a focused format where a clear narrative arc and tight preparation matter most.
Our data rates Knowledge Management -by AI-'s guest bar at 80/100 (Premium tier). Established thought leaders with verified media credentials. Sign in to PitchCentric to see how your own Pod Score compares against this show.
Methodology. Booking Probability™ blends Listen Score, 30-day Virality, open-to-guests detection, and Apple ratings. Data refreshed every 60 minutes. Listen Score and Booking Probability are calculated by PitchCentric. Last enriched 11 days ago.