Loading…
Hosted by Shepler@Civics · 🇺🇸 US · EN-US · 26 episodes
Established thought leaders with verified media credentials.
Gavel to Gavel dives into all kinds of court cases—from famous Supreme Court decisions to lesser-known legal battles—with student voices leading the way. We break down complex issues, explore different sides, and connect them to what’s happening today. It’s engaging, easy to follow, and designed to get you thinking about your rights, the law, and how it all impacts your everyday life.
Shepler@Civics hosts Gavel To Gavel: Student Perspectives on Supreme Court Landmarks, a government show with 26 episodes published.
In this episode, Federal Judge Jen Wilson introduces the season and explains the rights of the accused. Students learn why these rights are important and how they protect fairness in the justice system.
In this episode, we learn why police must tell people their rights before questioning them. This helps students understand their rights and how they are protected.
In this episode, we explore how the Court said people have the right to a lawyer during questioning. This helps students understand the importance of having help when facing serious situations.
In this episode, we learn that prosecutors must share important evidence with the defense. This helps students understand that fairness means everyone gets the full story.
In this episode, we discover how the Court decided what counts as a “speedy trial.” This helps students understand why it’s important not to wait too long for justice.
In this episode, we learn how the Court said people cannot be excluded from juries because of race. This helps students understand fairness and why everyone deserves equal treatment.
In this episode, we learn how the Court stopped the death penalty for a time because it was not being used fairly. This helps students understand how laws can change when they are unfair.
In this episode, we explore how the Court looked at fairness in sentencing. This helps students think about why rules must be applied equally to everyone.
In this episode, we discover why the Court ruled that people under 18 cannot receive the death penalty. This helps students understand that the law recognizes that kids and adults are different.
In this episode, we learn how tracking someone with a device raised questions about privacy. This case helps students understand how technology and rules about personal space connect.
In this episode, we explore how the Court ruled that police usually need a warrant to search a cell phone. This helps students see how personal information—like messages and photos—is protected.
In this episode, we learn how the Supreme Court decided when police can search a car after an arrest. This case helps students understand that rules exist to protect people’s privacy, even when someone is in trouble.
West Virginia State Board of Education v. Barnette (1943) ruled that students cannot be forced to salute the flag or recite the Pledge of Allegiance. The Supreme Court held that compelled patriotic speech violates the Fi
Engel v. Vitale (1962) ruled that school-sponsored prayer in public schools violates the Establishment Clause. The Supreme Court held that even voluntary, nondenominational prayer is unconstitutional in a government-fund
Wisconsin v. Yoder (1972) ruled that Amish families could not be forced to send their children to school past eighth grade. The Supreme Court held that compulsory education laws violated their First Amendment right to re
Ingraham v. Wright (1977) upheld the use of corporal punishment in public schools, ruling it does not violate the Eighth Amendment. The Supreme Court found that school discipline is a local matter, leaving regulation to
Island Trees School District v. Pico (1982) ruled that schools cannot remove books from libraries simply because they dislike their content. The Supreme Court held that doing so violates students’ First Amendment rights.
Plyler v. Doe (1982) ruled that states cannot deny free public education to undocumented children. The Supreme Court held that such policies violate the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.
New Jersey v. T.L.O. (1985) ruled that schools can search students without a warrant if they have reasonable suspicion. The Supreme Court held that the Fourth Amendment applies in schools but with a lower standard than p
Bethel v. Fraser (1986) ruled that schools can discipline students for lewd or inappropriate speech. The Supreme Court held that the First Amendment does not protect vulgar speech in a school setting.
Sponsor detection runs nightly. Check back soon.
No public pitch examples yet for this show.
Generate your own personalised pitchBased on semantic analysis of episode topics and host coverage, this show is a strong guest fit for executives in:
Industry fit is computed by PitchCentric using vector embeddings of the show's episode catalog.
Shows with the most semantically similar episode content. Pitch one, pitch all; producers cluster.
To pitch Gavel To Gavel: Student Perspectives on Supreme Court Landmarks, visit https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/terrance-shepler for contact information, then craft a tight one-paragraph hook that ties your expertise to a gap in their recent government coverage.
Gavel To Gavel: Student Perspectives on Supreme Court Landmarks is hosted by Shepler@Civics. The show is categorised under government and has published 26 episodes.
Gavel To Gavel: Student Perspectives on Supreme Court Landmarks has published 26 episodes.
Gavel To Gavel: Student Perspectives on Supreme Court Landmarks regularly covers government. It sits in the government category.
Gavel To Gavel: Student Perspectives on Supreme Court Landmarks is accessible for guests with genuine government expertise. A personalised, episode-aware pitch will still outperform a generic one every time.
Gavel To Gavel: Student Perspectives on Supreme Court Landmarks hasn't explicitly signalled guest openness in recent episodes. That doesn't rule out pitching. your hook just needs to be especially compelling and relevant to their recent content.
Episodes of Gavel To Gavel: Student Perspectives on Supreme Court Landmarks average 5 minutes. a focused format where a clear narrative arc and tight preparation matter most.
Our data rates Gavel To Gavel: Student Perspectives on Supreme Court Landmarks's guest bar at 80/100 (Premium tier). Established thought leaders with verified media credentials. Sign in to PitchCentric to see how your own Pod Score compares against this show.
Methodology. Booking Probability™ blends Listen Score, 30-day Virality, open-to-guests detection, and Apple ratings. Data refreshed every 60 minutes. Listen Score and Booking Probability are calculated by PitchCentric. Last enriched 4 days ago.