PitchCentric
Emma•ism podcast artwork

society

Emma•ism

Hosted by Emma Søndergaard Jensen · society · EN

Apple PodcastsWebsite

About this Podcast:

A 2025 graduate of the London School of Economic’s MSc in Philosophy and Public Policy program, 2024 Thouron Award winner, and 2024 graduate of the University of Pennsylvania’s (BA) philosophy department shares her love of philosophy through podcasts. Emma-ism is presented by Emma Søndergaard Jensen, author of “How to Excel in Undergraduate Philosophy.” Her podcast is for other seekers of knowledge to understand texts more deeply, learn about new philosophers, and discover a new point of view. This will be done through text analyses, modern-day implication discussions, interviews, and lectures.

Pitch Analysis

Required Pod Score for this podcast. PitchCentric checks your profile against host openness, topical fit, and audience signals before you generate a pitch.

Contact path

Verified email

Booking probability

34%

Guest openness

Selective

Verified email on file
80/100
Required Score

Sign up to generate a grounded pitch for Emma•ism.

Signup to Generate a Pitch

Questions about Emma•ism

What is Emma•ism about?

A 2025 graduate of the London School of Economic’s MSc in Philosophy and Public Policy program, 2024 Thouron Award winner, and 2024 graduate of the University of Pennsylvania’s (BA) philosophy department shares her love of philosophy through podcasts.

Who hosts Emma•ism?

Emma•ism is hosted by Emma Søndergaard Jensen. The show has published 95 episodes to date.

What has Emma•ism covered recently?

Recent episodes include "Love is Blind: Exploring Dealbreakers" (18 October 2026, 30 minutes), "Going for Gold: A Plan for Implementation" (27 September 2026, 21 minutes), and "Love Isn’t Real" (23 March 2026, 23 minutes).

How often does Emma•ism publish?

Emma•ism publishes roughly monthly, with episodes averaging 22 minutes across 95 episodes.

How hard is it to get booked on Emma•ism?

Booking probability for Emma•ism is 34%, and the host is rated Selective on guests. Emma•ism requires a Pod Score of 80 or higher. Emma•ism's contact route on record: verified email.

Who should pitch Emma•ism?

The strongest fits for Emma•ism are Courses, Coaching & Lessons. Emma•ism has a society audience.

About the host

Emma Søndergaard Jensen hosts Emma•ism, a society podcast with 95 episodes published.

Verified host email: ████████@████.comSign in to unlock →

Recent episodes

Our AI reads these to draft pitches. Use them as grounding for a pitch that cites a real guest and a specific topic.

  • Oct 18, 202630 minS8

    In this episode, Love is Blind Season 11 (Boston! ) is dicussed in terms of applying the philosophical concept of dealbreakers. Drawing on Tom Dougherty’s account of deception and consent and Campell Brown’s idea that...

  • Sep 27, 202621 min

    How should we enact the revision to the rare disease medicine evidence hierarchy that I proposed in my LSE dissertation? This podcast explains how. Loosely, there should be 4 review steps: 1. Confirm the Study is for a...

  • Mar 23, 202623 minS8

    In this episode, it is held that love isn’t real, or at the very most, it could exist, but we will never know for sure if we have experienced it or not. With romantic love, we continually lack certainty. Three...

View More
  • Sep 22, 20254 min

    It’s time to talk about my disseration. This short teaser introduces the 4-part series that explains my Master’s dissertation from the London School of Economics. The dissertation was titled, “Going for Gold: A Proposal...

  • Sep 22, 202519 min

    In this episode, Mathias Risse’s 2004 claim that “unless majoritarians present a more complete defense, it is irrational to grant majority rule its default status” is evaluated. It is argues that it is rational to grant...

  • Apr 21, 202518 min

    In this episode, manipulability in the conclave voting procedure is discussed. Rest in peace to Pope Francis. This podcast comes as a discussion of the aggregation method used by cardinals in electing the next pope. The...

  • Apr 5, 202514 min

    In this episode, it is argued that the causal efficacy of an act is what matters to its evaluation, not its auspiciousness. Discussion of decision theories of Jeffrey and Savage are what motivates that claim. Further...

  • Apr 5, 202518 min

    In this episode, it is argued that no-platforming should be opposed on purely epistemic grounds because it deprives students of epistemic benefits that would have been realized had the contrarian (cancelled academic)...

  • Jan 17, 202517 min

    In this episode, mechanisms and research are discussed. The question, ‘if we have a randomized control trial (RCT), can we do without knowledge of a mechanism?’ is answered. It is held that mechanisms do make a...

  • Oct 13, 202420 min

    In this episode, philosopher Ian Peeble’s 2021 article, “To Race or Not to Race: A Normative Debate in the Philosophy of Race,” is discussed. An argument is put forth that Peeble’s argument for the morally permissible...

  • Aug 4, 202423 min

    In this episode, the resurgence of the traditional wife lifestyle on social media is examined. The recent outrage from women about this lifestyle and the receiving opposing reaction to that outrage is discussed. It is...

  • Dec 9, 202326 minS8

    In this episode, the third of a four-part series is presented. Topics inclusde abortion, cloning, surrogacy, and IVF. Is being a human being enough to exact moral obligations from others?

  • Dec 8, 202319 minS8

    In this episode, the second episode of a four-part series is presented. The Nuremberg Code, Declaration of Helsinki, and Belmont Report are all overviewed. How ought we respect individuals’ rights and interests in...

  • Dec 8, 202328 minS8

    In this episode, the first of a four-part series is presented. This episode covers the Nuremberg Trial (and Code), and human research ethics. In particular, the US human radiation experiments and the Guatemala STD...

  • Nov 6, 202323 minS8

    In this podcast, informed consent is discussed. This discussion is organized by two article overviews. Beauchamp and Faden’s “The Concept of Informed Consent” and Katz’s “Informed Consent — Must it Remain a Fairy Tale?”...

Recent guests

Recent guests on Emma•ism. Study who booked and why before you pitch.

Best industries to pitch Emma•ism for

PitchCentric classifies Emma•ism under these industries. Guests from them are the closest fit, and each links to the best podcasts in that industry.

Similar Podcasts

Shows with the most semantically similar episode content. Pitch one, pitch all; producers cluster.

Podcasts like Emma•ism

Is this podcast yours and you'd like to remove or correct details? Request removal or email privacy@pitchcentric.com.

Questions about the free trial? See the pricing FAQ