Hosted by Various · 🇺🇸 US · EN · 14 episodes
Established thought leaders with verified media credentials.
The Blue Review was a brief yet vibrant monthly journal launched in London from May to July 1913. Serving as the successor to Rhythm, it was edited by the talented duo of John Middleton Murry and Katherine Mansfield, but unfortunately lasted for only three issues. This eclectic publication featured a rich mix of poetry, short stories, and insightful critiques of theatre, music, and the arts, alongside reviews of notable books released in both English and French. The inaugural issue includes D. H. Lawrences captivating short story, The Soiled Rose, which later found new life as Shades of Spring. - Summary by Phil Benson
Various hosts Blue Review, Number 1, a arts show with 14 episodes published.
The Blue Review was a brief yet vibrant monthly journal launched in London from May to July 1913. Serving as the successor to Rhythm, it was edited by the talented duo of John Middleton Murry and Katherine Mansfield, but
Show notesThe Blue Review was a brief yet vibrant monthly journal launched in London from May to July 1913. Serving as the successor to Rhythm, it was edited by the talented duo of John Middleton Murry and Katherine Mansfield, but
Show notesThe Blue Review was a brief yet vibrant monthly journal launched in London from May to July 1913. Serving as the successor to Rhythm, it was edited by the talented duo of John Middleton Murry and Katherine Mansfield, but
Show notesThe Blue Review was a brief yet vibrant monthly journal launched in London from May to July 1913. Serving as the successor to Rhythm, it was edited by the talented duo of John Middleton Murry and Katherine Mansfield, but
Show notesThe Blue Review was a brief yet vibrant monthly journal launched in London from May to July 1913. Serving as the successor to Rhythm, it was edited by the talented duo of John Middleton Murry and Katherine Mansfield, but
Show notesThe Blue Review was a brief yet vibrant monthly journal launched in London from May to July 1913. Serving as the successor to Rhythm, it was edited by the talented duo of John Middleton Murry and Katherine Mansfield, but
Show notesThe Blue Review was a brief yet vibrant monthly journal launched in London from May to July 1913. Serving as the successor to Rhythm, it was edited by the talented duo of John Middleton Murry and Katherine Mansfield, but
Show notesThe Blue Review was a brief yet vibrant monthly journal launched in London from May to July 1913. Serving as the successor to Rhythm, it was edited by the talented duo of John Middleton Murry and Katherine Mansfield, but
Show notesThe Blue Review was a brief yet vibrant monthly journal launched in London from May to July 1913. Serving as the successor to Rhythm, it was edited by the talented duo of John Middleton Murry and Katherine Mansfield, but
Show notesThe Blue Review was a brief yet vibrant monthly journal launched in London from May to July 1913. Serving as the successor to Rhythm, it was edited by the talented duo of John Middleton Murry and Katherine Mansfield, but
Show notesThe Blue Review was a brief yet vibrant monthly journal launched in London from May to July 1913. Serving as the successor to Rhythm, it was edited by the talented duo of John Middleton Murry and Katherine Mansfield, but
Show notesThe Blue Review was a brief yet vibrant monthly journal launched in London from May to July 1913. Serving as the successor to Rhythm, it was edited by the talented duo of John Middleton Murry and Katherine Mansfield, but
Show notesThe Blue Review was a brief yet vibrant monthly journal launched in London from May to July 1913. Serving as the successor to Rhythm, it was edited by the talented duo of John Middleton Murry and Katherine Mansfield, but
Show notesThe Blue Review was a brief yet vibrant monthly journal launched in London from May to July 1913. Serving as the successor to Rhythm, it was edited by the talented duo of John Middleton Murry and Katherine Mansfield, but
Show notesSponsor detection runs nightly. Check back soon.
No public pitch examples yet for this show.
Generate your own personalised pitchBased on semantic analysis of episode topics and host coverage, this show is a strong guest fit for executives in:
Industry fit is computed by PitchCentric using vector embeddings of the show's episode catalog.
Shows with the most semantically similar episode content. Pitch one, pitch all; producers cluster.
Blue Review, Number 1 has a verified contact on file. Create a free PitchCentric account to access it and generate a personalised pitch in seconds. Research at least 3 recent episodes first and lead with a specific angle that serves their arts audience.
Blue Review, Number 1 is hosted by Various. The show is categorised under arts (books) and has published 14 episodes.
Blue Review, Number 1 has published 14 episodes.
Blue Review, Number 1 regularly covers arts, books, fiction. It sits in the arts category, with a books focus.
Blue Review, Number 1 is accessible for guests with genuine arts expertise. A personalised, episode-aware pitch will still outperform a generic one every time.
Blue Review, Number 1 hasn't explicitly signalled guest openness in recent episodes. That doesn't rule out pitching. your hook just needs to be especially compelling and relevant to their recent content.
Episodes of Blue Review, Number 1 average 13 minutes. a focused format where a clear narrative arc and tight preparation matter most.
Our data rates Blue Review, Number 1's guest bar at 80/100 (Premium tier). Established thought leaders with verified media credentials. Sign in to PitchCentric to see how your own Pod Score compares against this show.
Methodology. Booking Probability™ blends Listen Score, 30-day Virality, open-to-guests detection, and Apple ratings. Data refreshed every 60 minutes. Listen Score and Booking Probability are calculated by PitchCentric. Last enriched 9 days ago.
